The Legalize Dueling Institute · Washington, D.C. · Est. 2026 Organizational Prospectus LD-OP-1 · An independent, nonpartisan research body
The Legalize Dueling Institute RIGOR · CONSENT · ATTRITION
Organizational prospectus

About the Institute

The Legalize Dueling Institute is an independent, nonpartisan research body devoted to a single policy question: whether managed, fully consensual attrition can durably reduce American violence. Our answer is published, modeled, and open to challenge. Our motto is our method: Rigor. Consent. Attrition.

Mission

What we do

The Institute publishes. It does not schedule, host, officiate, or attend engagements; it models them, footnotes them, and projects their aggregate consequences with confidence intervals. We hold that America's violence problem is, at bottom, an inventory problem, and that inventory responds to subtraction. We further hold — and have defended at length1 — that a calmer America is a better America: slower to escalate, quicker to de-escalate, better at living alongside itself.

Everything the Institute proposes rests on one cornerstone, stated wherever we are given a wall: participation is for consenting adults only, at their own notarized initiative, revocable to the count of ten. The Institute has no other product and no other premise.

Leadership

The advisory board

Dr. Margaret Pemberton‑Ashe

Senior Fellow, Generational Outcomes

Col. (Ret.) Dewitt Farrow

Chair, Historical Precedent

Dr. Lionel Osgood‑Whitt

Director, Attrition Economics

Prof. Henrietta Vail

Senior Fellow, Consent Studies

Mr. Barnaby Quince, C.P.A.

Treasurer

Dr. Prudence Marsh

Fellow, Tranquility Metrics

“We spent two centuries assuming the inclination would fade if ignored. It has not. The Framework is what taking it seriously looks like.” Dr. Prudence Marsh · Fellow, Tranquility Metrics
Fellowships & careers

Open positions

Table 5.1 · Current openings
PositionTermNotes
Junior Fellow, Attrition Economics2 yrsRenewable upon review
Notary of Consent (Municipal)OngoingMultiple openings; travel required; must be prepared to halt proceedings without hesitation
Registrar of OutcomesOngoingRecords management; discretion; state filing experience preferred
Archivist, Registry of CorrespondenceOngoingMaintains the Register of Objections (Form LD‑9)

Applications are accepted by post and answered in the order received.

Press

Coverage

The Institute makes its fellows available for comment on the Framework, the Attrition Model™, and the historical record. Journalists are directed first to Working Paper No. 12; inquiries beyond its scope are answered in writing.2

Correspondence

The Quarterly Report of Managed Outcomes

The Institute's newsletter is issued four (4) times per year, reporting model revisions, registry statistics, and the state of the objections correspondence. Subscription is free, voluntary, and — in keeping with everything else we do — revocable at any moment, for any reason.

Form LD‑Q1 — Subscription ISSUED QUARTERLY
Subscriber information

This form stores and transmits nothing.

Notes

  1. Legalize Dueling Inst., Working Paper No. 4: On the Civic Value of Tranquility (2026), pp. 1–44.
  2. Legalize Dueling Inst., Statement on Press Inquiries (2026).